JUDY MARIE SCHAFFER F.N.P.
NPI 1902818115
Personal Emergency Response Attendant in Portland, OR

Q: What is the provider's specialty?

The provider's specialty is Personal Emergency Response Attendant with taxonomy code 146D00000X.

Active since August 13, 2006

421 SW OAK ST, 210, PORTLAND, OR 97204(503) 988-3663(503) 988-4098 Get Directions Write a Review

NPPES record last updated: March 7, 2023. Verified against the NPPES registry weekly; last sync: July 19, 2026.

On this page

About Judy Marie Schaffer F.n.p. NPPES

Official registry information on file with the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System.

JUDY MARIE SCHAFFER F.N.P. (NPI 1902818115) is an individual personal emergency response attendant in Portland, Oregon, licensed in Oregon (080046279N1FNPPP) and active in the NPI registry since August 2006.

NPPES Registry Identity

NPI1902818115

Entity TypeIndividualFemale

Primary Taxonomy146D00000X

Provider Legal NameJUDY MARIE SCHAFFERCredential: F.N.P.

Location Address421 SW OAK ST, 210Portland, OR 97204-1817

Mailing Address600 Ne 8th St, 3rd FloorGresham, OR 97030-7317 · (503) 988-3663 · Fax (503) 988-4098

Phone(503) 988-3663

Fax(503) 988-4098

Sole ProprietorNo

Enumeration DateAugust 13, 2006

Last NPPES UpdateMarch 7, 2023

✔ NPI 1902818115 is a valid, active identifier and passes the ISO check-digit test.

Specialties & Licenses

★ Primary SpecialtyPersonal Emergency Response AttendantEmergency Medical Service Providers

Taxonomy Code146D00000X

License✔ Licensed in OR · 080046279N1FNPPP

Definition

Individuals that are specially trained to assist patients living at home with urgent/emergent situations. These individuals must be able to perform CPR and basic first aid and have sufficient counseling skills to allay fears and assist in working through processes necessary to resolve the crisis. Functions may include transportation to various facilities and businesses, contacting agencies to initiate remediation service or providing reassurance.

421 SW OAK ST, Portland, OR 97204

Open in Google Maps ↗

Other Identifiers 2

Other500008420OR · United Healthcare

Medicaid291674OR

Medicare Quality Performance CMS QPP · MIPS

Performance in the CMS Quality Payment Program: the MIPS final score across four weighted categories, and the individual quality measures reported to Medicare.

Reported Quality Measures

Cervical Cancer Screening

Percentage of women 21-64 years of age who were screened for cervical cancer using either of the following criteria: - Women age 21-64 who had cervical cytology performed every 3 years - Women age 30-64 who had cervical cytology/human papillomavirus (HPV)…

85%94 patients

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Percentage of adults 50-75 years of age who had appropriate screening for colorectal cancer

32%44 patients2/55-star benchmark: 85%

Diabetes: Foot Exam

The percentage of patients 18-75 years of age with diabetes (type 1 and type 2) who received a foot exam (visual inspection and sensory exam with mono filament and a pulse exam) during the measurement year

71%35 patients3/55-star benchmark: 98%

Diabetes: Medical Attention for Nephropathy

The percentage of patients 18-75 years of age with diabetes who had a nephropathy screening test or evidence of nephropathy during the measurement period

94%35 patients4/55-star benchmark: 99%

Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record

Percentage of visits for patients aged 18 years and older for which the eligible professional or eligible clinician attests to documenting a list of current medications using all immediate resources available on the date of the encounter.

68%186 patients1/55-star benchmark: 100%

Preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index (BMI) Screening and Follow-Up Plan

Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older with a BMI documented during the current encounter or during the previous twelve months AND with a BMI outside of normal parameters, a follow-up plan is documented during the encounter or during the previous…

50%139 patients3/55-star benchmark: 97%

Preventive Care and Screening: Influenza Immunization

Percentage of patients aged 6 months and older seen for a visit between October 1 and March 31 who received an influenza immunization OR who reported previous receipt of an influenza immunization

56%185 patients3/55-star benchmark: 88%

Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for Depression and Follow-Up Plan

Percentage of patients aged 12 years and older screened for depression on the date of the encounter using an age appropriate standardized depression screening tool AND if positive, a follow-up plan is documented on the date of the positive screen

88%113 patients4/55-star benchmark: 96%

Preventive Care and Screening: Tobacco Use: Screening and Cessation Intervention

Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who were screened for tobacco use one or more times within 24 months AND who received tobacco cessation intervention if identified as a tobacco user

Patients tobacco: 96% · 23 patients

96%23 patients

Primary Caries Prevention Intervention as Offered by Primary Care Providers, including Dentists

Percentage of children, age 0-20 years, who received a fluoride varnish application during the measurement period

57%75 patients

Statin Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease

Percentage of the following patients - all considered at high risk of cardiovascular events - who were prescribed or were on statin therapy during the measurement period: - Adults aged >= 21 years who were previously diagnosed with or currently have an active…

79%34 patients4/55-star benchmark: 89%

Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity for Children and Adolescents

Percentage of patients 3-17 years of age who had an outpatient visit with a Primary Care Physician (PCP) or Obstetrician/Gynecologist (OB/GYN) and who had evidence of the following during the measurement period. Three rates are reported.

Patients nutrition: 58% · 38 patients

Patients physicalActivity: 63% · 38 patients

97%38 patients

Providers report different measures because they deliver different services; reporting more or less information is not a reflection of quality. Star ratings appear only where CMS assigned them.